ChiCTR1900023885
结束
/
/
/
2019-06-15
/
/
肱骨上骨折
Procedural outcomes of double vs. single fluoroscopy for fixing supracondylar humerus fractures in children
Procedural outcomes of double vs. single fluoroscopy for fixing supracondylar humerus fractures in children
The most common elbow fractures, especially in children under the age of 7 years, are supracondylar fractures. These injuries mostly caused by falling on an outstretched hand while elbow in extension or hyperextension [1]. Pediatric elbow fractures account for approximately 60% of upper extremity fractures and more than 13% of all pediatric fractures [2]. Supracondylar humerus fractures (SHF) of pediatric patients may be difficult to treat for an inexperienced specialist [3]. These types of fractures are divided into two types as extension and flexion [4]. Extension type fractures are seen in 95-98% of the patients and in 2-5% flexion type fractures are seen [4]. SHF is divided into 3 types according to the Gartland classification. Type 1 is stable and minimally displaced fracture, while type 2 and 3 are displaced fractures [5]. The treatment of SHF type 1 fractures is closed reduction and plaster application, percutaneous pinning method is preferred after either open or closed reduction in the treatment of Type 2 and Type 3 fractures [4]. Recently, double fluoroscopy method began to be used during the surgical procedures [6-8]. Double fluoroscopy was used in the nailing of intertrochanteric femoral fractures [6], Boszczyk et al. stated that using double scopy in kyphoplasty cases reduced the radiation exposure time [7]. Similarly, Peng et al. also stated that patients with pelvic trauma had less radiation exposure time in sacroiliac screw application with using double fluoroscopy [8]. There is not enough information about the usage of double fluoroscopy in the treatment of pediatric SHF. We hypothesized that radiological and functional results will be better in patients who were operated by using double fluoroscopy. In this study, we aimed to compare the functional, radiological results and also radiation exposure times of patients with SHF who were treated by double or single fluoroscopy.
横断面
诊断试验新技术
Forty patients who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) with the diagnosis of SHF between March 2016 and April 2018 were included in the study. In other words, every patient was included if has not any problem with inclusion criteria.
N/A
No
/
21;19
/
2019-03-15
2019-06-15
/
Type 2 and Type 3 extension type fractures were included in this study and patients who had undergone CRPP were included in this study.；
请登录查看Patients with type 1 fractures, patients with a fracture older than 2 days, patients with open fractures, patients who required open reduction, patients with flexion type, patients with additional fractures of the same extremity, patients with preoperative nerve injury and patients without adequate follow-up were excluded from the study.；
请登录查看Sirnak State Hospital
/
英百瑞生物2025-12-05
艾力斯医药科技2025-12-05
神曦生物NeuExcell2025-12-05
科望医药2025-12-05
宠药生态圈2025-12-05
丁香园 Insight 数据库2025-12-05
佰傲谷BioValley2025-12-05
药精通Bio2025-12-05
医药观澜2025-12-05
贝达药业2025-12-05
400-9696-311 转1
400-9696-311 转2
400-9696-311 转3
400-9696-311 转4
浙公网安备33011002015279
本网站未发布麻醉药品、精神药品、医疗用毒性药品、放射性药品、戒毒药品和医疗机构制剂的产品信息
友情链接: 摩熵医药 摩熵医药企业版 摩熵化学MolAid 晓材Matmole 摩熵医学MedXYZ 载体质粒 觅健肿瘤互助 动脉网 药物百科 中国医疗人才网 医药招商网
