400-9696-311 转1
400-9696-311 转3
400-9696-311 转4
400-9696-311 转5
400客服电话
购买数据产品
400-9696-311 转1
定制咨询业务
400-9696-311 转2
数据与AI定制业务
400-9696-311 转3
商务合作及其他问题
400-9696-311 转4
投诉及建议
400-9696-311 转5
ChiCTR1900027713
结束
/
/
/
2019-11-24
/
/
因胆石症和胆总管结石引起的阻塞性黄疸
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of single-stage ERCP plus Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus two-stage ERCP followed by Laparoscopic cholecystectomy 6 to 8 weeks later
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of single-stage ERCP plus Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus two-stage ERCP followed by Laparoscopic cholecystectomy 6 to 8 weeks later
46040
The present study aimed to assess the feasibility of performing cholecystectomy in the same session or same hospitalization following single-stage ERCP in patients with obstructive jaundice due to cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis.
随机平行对照
其它
The cases were performed by lot by simple randomization method.
No
No financial support in this study
/
37;39;43
/
2017-10-10
2018-10-10
/
Eligibility criteria included no difficulty in ERCP, bile duct stones and cholelithiasis as demonstrated by an imaging method, no suspected or confirmed malignancy, no history of abdominal surgery and absence of contraindications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.;
请登录查看Exclusion criteria included age under 16 years, pregnancy, diagnostic ERCP, Perforated gallbladder, suspected or confirmed malignancy and uncompleted ERCP. Patients not meeting the eligibility criteria were excluded. ERCP and LC procedures were performed by the same endoscopic surgeon. The indication for ERCP was thoroughly evaluated for each patient in consultation with a radiologist prior to the procedure.;
请登录查看No financial support in this study
46040
德琪医药2026-07-20
动脉网-最新2026-07-20
药精通Bio2026-07-20
求实药社2026-07-20
求实药社2026-07-20
康方生物Akeso2026-07-20
干细胞与外泌体2026-07-20
加科思2026-07-20
良医汇肿瘤资讯2026-07-19
GLP1减重宝典2026-07-19